Writer: Erin Ruprecht
Editor: Jessica Kaplan
Fall 2023
The issue of banning books has been debated by legislators, local governments, academic institutions, educators, and parents. Bill H.Res.1392 recognizes ‘Banned Books Week’ and the censorship of books in the US today, acknowledging the central role books play in promoting democratic and civil discourse. This matter is of incredible significance, as it pertains to the education of future American children and their fundamental right to obtain knowledge through books.
If not addressed promptly, the sweeping attacks on books will result in detrimental implications for American children. This bill acknowledges the benefits of books, including students’ ability to learn from a diverse range of stories and perspectives, the development of critical thinking, exposure to aspects of the human condition, as well as a relatable outlet for kids who may not have one. This bill communicates the multifaceted and harmful consequences of book censoring on “students who have a right to access a diverse range of stories and perspectives; students, from historically marginalized backgrounds; and parents who want to raise students in schools that remain open to curiosity, discovery, and the freedom to read (Text - H.res.1392).”
The attack on books stems from the ‘concern’ of parents and has catapulted to the ‘concern’ of the law. Yet, the American Library Association’s statistics indicate that a majority of Americans are against book bans and, therefore, oppose the interference of the government regarding academic subjects. When taking a closer look at the content being banned, it is evident that it only censors diverse perspectives. Statistics indicate that 41% of banned books have LGBTQ+ themes, 40% have protagonists of color, 21% have titles with race and racism, 10% have titles of rights and activism, and 4% involve religious minorities (Friedman). Therefore, the overarching question is: are parents concerned for their kids or concerned their kids will obtain perspectives different from their own?
Critical thinking is the act of analyzing facts, evidence, judgments, and ultimately applying that information to form a logical conclusion. This skill is developed through education and, therefore, through the investigation of perspectives different from one’s own. Parents in favor of banning books desire control over the content their children consume (Bailey). The innate inclination to protect children, specifically, is prevalent throughout American society and across the world. However, when parents are provided avenues to censor material that challenges their personal views, their children are unable to form their own beliefs (Bailey). When students are barred from exploring perspectives that vary from their upbringing, regardless of political affiliation, critical thinking perishes.
Additionally, controversial books expose kids to morality and allow them to decipher their own views of right and wrong. There are valid concerns of racist or sexist themes in certain books, but by banning and ignoring these issues, our society is choosing to believe that these narratives don't exist. The bill states the concern that many classic, award-winning pieces of literature, which have been in school curriculums for decades, are being challenged, removed from libraries, or banned altogether. Many pieces of classic literature have problematic undertones, however, it can be argued that this gives society direct insight into the past, allowing new generations to evolve from their mistakes in the future (Bailey).
Simultaneously, books pertaining to marginalized groups, sexual orientation, and nonconformists are at a heightened risk of being censored. These themes allow kids to explore topics they may otherwise not be exposed to, where they are then able to make personal decisions regarding their values. There are obviously age-appropriate books for each grade level, and that is why educators, who have degrees and expertise in this field, should be just as trusted as any other mainstream profession, such as doctors and lawyers, would be.
Censored books lead to the question of why diverse perspectives are being challenged and, in turn, a personal opportunity for readers to experience a wide range of ideas. Many banned books include topics of grief, divorce, bullying, prejudice, racism, sexual assault, and sexual identity, all of which students can commonly experience in the real world (McMahon). By providing kids with a story that may relate to their own lives, books bring relief and relatability to children who may not find comfort in their own homes.
In conclusion, Bill H.Res.1392 acknowledges the importance of how books develop differing perspectives, critical thinking, exposure to morality, and story relatability. Recognizing the imperative role that books play in promoting a diverse and equal country teaches a lesson in itself - upholding the foundation that our country was built on - democracy.
References
Bailey, Caitlin. “Book Banning: The End of Critical Thinking.” The Ridge Review,
Friedman, Jonathan. “Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Ban Books.” PEN
America, 4 Apr. 2023
McMahon, Regan. “Why Your Kid Should Read Banned Books.” Common Sense Media,
Text - H.res.1392 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Recognizing "Banned …
Comentários